June 8, 2009
If you are in the business of causing mayhem, this is where you can have your efforts evaluated. Expect to meet The Joker, The Penguin and The Riddler in the waiting room.
And apologies for throwing in two Engrishfunny.com posts in quick succession!
May 27, 2009
I’ve just read an (as usual) excellent post by Dave Trott over at CST on the perils of saving something good for just the right moment. To paraphrase: If you have a good idea, use it now not tomorrow, because now is real while tomorrow may never happen.
In other words, imagine that you have a low value project running now and the possibility of a high value project coming up some time in the near future. Imagine, also, that you have just had a spark of inspiration that could be beneficial to either project, but can only be used once. You may be tempted to wait until the high value project comes along to try to gain the best possible return from your inspirational idea. This sounds sensible, but think about it another way: what if the future project never arrives? What if the future project turns out to be low value after all? What if the future project changes slightly so that your inspirational idea no longer fits? Then you get low or zero return on your idea. There are too many unknowns about the future, while there some guarantees about the present.
The present is here and real. You know that you’ll get some guaranteed return for your idea in the current low value project. And on top of that, if you came up with an inspirational idea once, you can do it again. If your idea for the present project is rejected then you still get a chance to apply it to the next project – multiple bites of the cherry.
Carpe diem quam minimum credula postero: “Seize the day and place no trust in tomorrow”. *
Or, more simply, “Use it or lose it”.
* Thanks to one of Dave Trott’s commenters for this full quote.
May 21, 2009
Engrishfunny.com usually elicits the odd smirk from me, but this one had me in stitches.
I can’t even imagine what “Leek Speculation Eggs” might be…
April 29, 2009
I’m a big fan of Google’s way of doing things. For example, the idea of spending one day a week on personal projects is a brilliant way to tap into the hidden skills and ideas of your staff. I’m also a big fan of data. Well, not data in it’s rawest sense, but the uses to which it can be put. So, really I’m a big fan of analytics. Google is one of the biggest repositories of behavioral data there is – simply because we spend so much of our time online and using Google to search.
Google Flu Trends
Google Flu Trends
One very beneficial graduate of Google’s labs is the Flu Trends product. This measures the prevalance of searches for flu related terms in the US and can estimate flu activity up to two weeks faster than traditional methods. And last week the Centres for Desease Control in the US asked Google to perform a similar analysis of data from Mexico to see if the spread of swine flu was reflected in the data before the media got hold of the story. And it was.
Google Flu Trends Mexico
As you can see from the above graph, there is an unseasonal rise in flu related searches from early April.
The power of this type of analysis is only just being realised, but the sheer amount of data and its range means that it is going to take some impressive analytical minds to design useful products. As this Wired article says, nobody was looking at the Mexico data when it would have been useful.
April 13, 2009
I don’t normally like simply pointing you to another blog entry with no narrative or analysis, but there isn’t really much else to say about this one. Definately one for the boys. The video’s about 4 1/2 minutes long but its worth hanging on for the slow-mo.
Mythbusters – what a job!
April 11, 2009
How do you show a span of 70,000 years on the same diagram as a span of 3 years? This is actually much more difficult that it might at first seem – especially if you have multiple items with very short spans that you want to show at the same time as a few items with very long spans.
I got thinking about this after reading a couple of factoids about the length of time it took for things like the iPod and Facebook to take off. I started thinking about the length of time it took for other technologies to reach 50,000,000 people, as this was the number used for the iPod and Facebook comparison. The image below is an attempt to show this information on a single diagram. I have included the rise of the human race, writing, radio, television, the Internet, the iPod and Facebook. I’d like to include more technologies to fill in the gaps in the thousands-of-years range, so I might update this diagram in the future.
Reaching 50 Million People
What was also interesting was the rate a which the reach of technology changed over time. By plotting the log of the age of the technology against the log of the length of time it took to reach 50 million people, I got the following chart.
Access to Technology
Although this isn’t really a formal scientific treatment, it looks like that for technologies that are accepted (i.e. continue to be popular after the initial hype), reaching 50 million people should now take less than a year – and this is only going to get quicker and quicker!
If you want to use either of these diagrams I am happy for you to do so, but please make sure you reference the source.
April 7, 2009
A long time ago I was a graphic designer. I was OK at it, and enjoyed it, but it was never going to be a career for me. One of the mantras I particularly enjoyed working to was “Keep It Simple”. I loved the opportunity to design a logo using a single colour, only one or two lines or shapes and some clever typography. Sometimes this was not only appropriate but the client loved it and everyone was happy!
On abduzeedo’s blog he/she (for I know not which) has trawled logopond for a collection of simple, single colour logos as part of a reference collection for a project. You can see the full collection here, and below are some of my favourites.